Scripsit Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 11:57:27AM +0000, Henning Makholm wrote:
>> Building stable once it is released does look indeed like a good >> option. Only it's a pity that the Vancouver plan does not allow it. > There are lots of things not "allowed" by the plan that are possible > nevertheless. Yes, but the fact stands that the particular plan we're discussing does not allow them. > Let's focus on making the plan useful, rather than treating it as a > final pronouncement, shall we? How do you propose that the plan can be made useful without pointing out its flaws? -- Henning Makholm "Al lykken er i ét ord: Overvægtig!"
