Hi, Henning Makholm wrote:
> Yes, but the fact stands that the particular plan we're discussing
> does not allow them.
>
If the plan is set in stone there's no(t much) need for discussion.
> How do you propose that the plan can be made useful without pointing
> out its flaws?
I am not Steve, but ...
... by describing improvements? Which is what we're doing. We KNOW that
the original plan doesn't have the changes we're talking about. I don't
know how often you've told us, but I think it's been often enough. ;-)
--
Matthias Urlichs | {M:U} IT Design @ m-u-it.de | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
