David Schmitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb: > On Monday 14 March 2005 16:27, Matthias Urlichs wrote: > >> Not when the alternate choice is to not have Debian support $ARCH at all. > > Please cite where this was proposed. I read the original Nybbles mail (and a > part of the current thread) but couldn't find the "at all" bit.
No testing, no release, no security support. For me, that is so close to "not support at all" that I hardly see the difference. I would see things different if it was "Not part of the main testing procedure" (using a different scheme), "Not necessarily released when the tier 1 arches are released", "No support for tier 2 arches by the tier 1 release managers and security teams, but we offer Debian infrastructure for yet-to-form RM and Security teams for each tier 2 arch". Regards, Frank -- Frank Küster Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich Debian Developer
