- Not having slower arches hold up testing.
Slower arches don't hold up testing. Arches with buildd not well managed do.
If you look at the current needs-build graph [1], m68k the slowest arch we support is going pretty well. On the other hand s390 (which is not a slow architectures), have the largest packages waiting to build.
Another example, I have uploaded lineakd yesterday, it is already built on all arches, except arm and ia64 [2]. In that case, I consider ia64 as a slow arch.
Bye, Aurelien
[1] http://people.debian.org/~igloo/needs-build-graph/index.php?arches=&days=10
[2] I have built it manually on s390 to get the plugins built in the first pass.
-- .''`. Aurelien Jarno | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73 : :' : Debian GNU/Linux developer | Electrical Engineer `. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] `- people.debian.org/~aurel32 | www.aurel32.net
-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
