On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 11:10:36AM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote: > pcc is barely at 98%. I don't think that barrier should be that high. We > *should* at last release with the tree most important archs: i386, amd64, > powerpc.
powerpc is clearly a release architecture; the question is whether it goes on ftp.d.o or scc.d.o. There's a point of view that says that committing to release powerpc from scc.d.o means that we're committed to making sure that we *can* release architectures from scc.d.o, which is a good thing ... Cheers, -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]