Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > None of the documentation calls it a 'queue', in fact; only people not > really involved in buildd stuff do.
Does that include you? In two recent messages, you referred to it as a queue. > > I can see excellent reasons why age in the list shouldn't matter. But > > package "priority" and "section" are extremely poor bases to decide > > what the actual importance of a package is. > > Why would that be the case? You're telling me you think gnome-games is > way more important than gcc for us to build? No. I'm saying that when priorities are marked badly, the results are disastrous. I'm also saying that a static ordering produces a perverse incentive, especially when a priority is marked badly, not to upload fixes for any other package. Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
