* Ingo Juergensmann ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050312 14:15]: > On Sat, Mar 12, 2005 at 02:06:24PM +0100, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
> > As it has been said earlier, the machines are back, but just need to > > catch up. So just waiting might be the easiest thing to do. > More machines can catch up faster than few can do. > When one machine out of a dozen machines is unavailable, it has less impact > than one machine failure out of two machines, although the chances will > raise that a machine will fail somewhen with more machines. But the impact > is less critical... If you take a look at http://buildd.debian.org/stats/graph2-week-big.png, you can e.g. see for mipsel exactly at which date the slow and at which the fast machine became available again. The fast machine alone is able to keep up with the usual upload rates. Cheers, Andi -- http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/ PGP 1024/89FB5CE5 DC F1 85 6D A6 45 9C 0F 3B BE F1 D0 C5 D1 D9 0C -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
