On Wed, 09 Mar 2005 21:35:56 +0100, Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Le mercredi 09 mars 2005 à 11:23 -0800, Blunt Jackson a écrit : > > I appreciate the clarification. What is desirable, then, is for the > > developer > > to be able to statically link his or her own libraries, and third > > party libraries, > > but to dynamically pick up "system" libraries, of which I would number > > libpthread. That would be adequate for my needs. I expect this is possible, > > as *everything* is possible, somehow. Perhaps it is something as trivial > > as a compiler or linker flag that I have missed? > > Yup, just enclose the libraries you want to link statically against > between -Wl,-Bstatic and -Wl,-Bdynamic: > > gcc -o something foo.o bar.o -lsystemlib -Wl,-Bstatic -lownlib > -lthirdpartylib -Wl,-Bdynamic -lpthread
This, of course, is the right workaround. Thank you! -:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-
