Le lundi 07 mars 2005 Ã 12:53 -0600, Steve Greenland a Ãcrit : > On 07-Mar-05, 11:06 (CST), Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > And the workaround we use for this bug is to blacklist one module when > > two of them provide the same functionality. The blacklists are in the > > alsa-base package, which should then be installed when ALSA modules are > > present. > > Why are the blacklists not in hotplug and/or discover, where the real > problem is? This is a serious question: Is there some reason that having > a module in the blacklist would cause a problem if the module wasn't > actually present?
Well, if you blacklist the OSS modules, you won't get any sound with a 2.4 kernel, as ALSA modules aren't installed by default in this case. > I a little concerned that we've worked around to a situation where > having the kernel require audio packages is seen a legitimate > solution... Actually, the proposed solution that raised some approval was to split out the ALSA modules, just like the pcmcia modules. -- .''`. Josselin Mouette /\./\ : :' : [EMAIL PROTECTED] `. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] `- Debian GNU/Linux -- The power of freedom
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=
