In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > That licence does not grant any permission to modify, > redistribute, or otherwise deal in the work in a Free manner. For it to be > judged as satisfying the Open Source Definition is ludicrous.
Are you an Laywer, is that based on research? I mean, for me "Use" of source code does include all those freedoms. Therfore I feel like accepting OSI's decision and accepting the fact that it is free. Greetings Bernd -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
