Paul Hampson wrote: > On Tue, Feb 22, 2005 at 12:44:27PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 22, 2005 at 08:48:48PM +1300, Nick Phillips wrote: > > > Running such a system in parallel with the current systems (and comparing > > > the outputs) might be a good test for gcc-as-cross-compiler, then... > > > And a hell of a lot of work. You can't just create checksums of the > > resulting binaries and compare those; it's not as if any difference > > between the two compiled binaries would constitute an error... > > Why not? Is there something non-deterministic in the compilation > process?
Yes. > Ideally, version x of gcc should produce the same output natively > as when cross-compiling. > > Or have I missed something important? gcc -fno-guess-branch-probability Thiemo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
