On Mon, 2005-02-21 at 16:12 -0800, Brian Nelson wrote:
> Yeah, definitely. If our goal is making our software as portable and
> bug-free as possible, we'd be better off running fewer arches but with a
> greater variety of compilers.
>
> Now if there were only any viable free alternatives to GCC...
>
Well, in the goal of better software, I'm willing to use closed source
compilers. I like finding bugs that way, *before* getting bug
reports...
And yes, the ARM compiler has some *strange* defaults... Whomever
picked their defaults didn't do ARM favors, even if it if they might be
conformant to the C standard....
- Jim
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
