* David Moreno Garza [Sat, 12 Feb 2005 18:59:22 -0600]:
> On Sat, 2005-02-12 at 22:52 +0100, Thomas Hood wrote:
> > On Sat, 12 Feb 2005 01:20:13 +0100, Anibal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
> > > Any input is welcome.
> > It would be nice if the page indicated which of the binary packages is new.
> The binary column indicates those created within the source package.
> Every source package on the summary is new, that's why it is on the NEW
> queue.
Not really. See e.g. the kdevelop3 source package, which already
exists in the archive. Sometimes, packages add one binary, or remove
one. In this case, it was a rename, and if IUIC, Thomas would like
something like:
kdevelop3
-kdevelop-data
-kdevelop-dev
-kdevelop-doc
-kdevelop-plugins
+kdevelop3-data
+kdevelop3-dev
+kdevelop3-doc
+kdevelop3-plugins
That is, a diff of the list of binary packages. Perhaps, one could
colour red removed packages, and blue added ones.
(Yes, I know red currently means 'targetted at experimental'. Mmmm,
you could colour the source package as red, because distribution
affects all of the binaries, right? If a package has more than one
upload, one would colour it red if the _latest_ one is targetted at
experimental.)
Just my 2˘, but is late here.
--
Adeodato Simó
EM: asp16 [ykwim] alu.ua.es | PK: DA6AE621
The true teacher defends his pupils against his own personal influence.
-- Amos Bronson Alcott
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
