On Sun, Feb 06, 2005 at 08:52:28AM -0500, Joey Hess wrote: > My feeling for some time has been that we should introduce a separate > section in the archive, or a separate archive and come up with the > infrastructure to upload -dbg packages to there, with separated > debugging symbols in them (see dh_strip). This could be done for nearly > all binary packages, not just libraries. Then people who want all the > -dbg packages available can just add an apt line and install them at > will.
We'll have to do a load of changes to the library packages when we introduce multiarch in etch anyhow; can't we do this at the same time? (Ie.: "New policy says you must follow multiarch, and make -dbg packages in libdevel-dbg"). I fail to see the big point of -dbg for non-libraries, though. Archive bloat is still a problem, though. /* Steinar */ -- Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]