El miÃ, 05-01-2005 a las 23:13 +0000, Matthew Garrett escribiÃ: > Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I agree with you on this. People using stable can not cope with > > upgrades each 6 months or so. > > The issue isn't the frequency of new stable releases - the issue is how > long a given stable release will be supported for. Releasing every 6 > months wouldn't be a problem if we could support the previous two > releases as well. That's probably excessive, but the optimal release > length depends on how much support we can provide.
Yes, but I think that we are not going to be able to support more than one release (or one and a half, if testing security team works) at a time, with perhaps supporting two for some time after the release of a new stable. This is not only an infraestructure problem, but a problem of DD time and DD effort and knowledge, which for some tasks can be a bit reduced. Cheers, -- Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Esta parte del mensaje =?ISO-8859-1?Q?est=E1?= firmada digitalmente
