On Sun, Jan 02, 2005 at 03:25:11PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Mon, Jan 03, 2005 at 09:17:43AM +1100, Russell Coker wrote: > > On Monday 03 January 2005 07:25, Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > This is true whether the bad things are false positives in email or > > > the deaths of hundreds of people. Certainly deaths are worse, but I > > > wasn't comparing false positives to deaths. > > > > I was explaining why your style of excuse is never acceptible. If > > > false positives are bad (and they are), they do not become less bad > > > because you cannot figure out how to avoid them and still achieve your > > > goals. > > > There is no comparison between killing people and bouncing email. Whatever > > point you were trying to make is lost. The thread is over. > > Maybe the real point here is that no one has come up with a spam control > solution yet that involves killing spammers.
At least, I can't see one on sourceforge ... :) Regards, Paddy -- Perl 6 will give you the big knob. -- Larry Wall
