On Fri, Dec 17, 2004 at 10:05:00AM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > Op do, 16-12-2004 te 17:07 -0800, schreef Adam McKenna: > > On Fri, Dec 17, 2004 at 01:13:11AM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote: > > > I think Wouter is only asking for reciprocity here. If they don't care > > > about his concerns why should he care about theirs ? Or alternatively > > > "not caring" is a freedom. > > > > We care because our priorities are our users and free software. Just > > because > > someone works for an ISV or develops on/for proprietary software does not > > make them a second class user. > > > > That said, I am not arguing for or against LCC, I just didn't like the tone > > of Wouter's e-mail, or the sentiment implied in it. > > I did not intend that sentiment; I explained what I meant to say in a > new thread.
I apologize for misinterpreting your sentiment. --Adam -- Adam McKenna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
