> As for OSS -- I had the impression that if I submitted patches to make > the modules *accept* command line arguments, they wouldn't be > included. But yeah, if they're straight GPL'ed that's good enough; I > could still distribute such patches even if they weren't included. > (and actually, everything in the *kernel* sources looks fine; I think > I was probably interpreting stuff that I saw on the usslite website. > So strictly speaking we're back to *one* bad example, which is QT...)
And then there's Cygnus, and cygwin32.dll - which is under the GPL, not the LPGL... (sorry for the cheap shot) Cheers, - Jim
pgpKccdk9pWdC.pgp
Description: PGP signature
