On Mon, 2004-12-06 at 01:18 -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > On Mon, 06 Dec 2004 01:08:31 -0600, Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > > On Mon, 2004-12-06 at 00:57 -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > >> On Sun, 5 Dec 2004 22:57:19 +0100, Jan Ingvoldstad > >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > >> > >> > Here's one useful suggestion, I think: > >> > >> > If hot-babe is useful as a .deb, make it available as such > >> > through its own web site or something. This works for many other > >> > packages not accepted into the Debian tree for whatever reason, > >> > why shouldn't it work for hot-babe? > >> > >> The reason other packages are not accepted into Debian is usually > >> license issues -- they are not fre. > > > But that's censorship! > > No, dear idiot, it is not. We do not distribute illegal > software, cause we are not scofflaws. We do not distribute non--free > stuff, cause that is the core of what we are. And if no DD does the > work, it is not here to be distributed. We do not censor based on > content.
Legal, illegal, what's the difference? *I* want to package it. Therefore, anyone who tries to stop me is censoring me. -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- Ron Johnson, Jr. Jefferson, LA USA PGP Key ID 8834C06B I prefer encrypted mail. "Experience should teach us to be most on our guard to protect liberty when the Government's purposes are beneficent. Men born to freedom are naturally alert to repel invasion of their liberty by evil-minded rulers. The greatest dangers to liberty lurk in insidious encroachment by men of zeal, well-meaning, but without understanding." Justice Louis Brandeis, dissenting, Olmstead v US (1928)
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
