On May 14, Yann Dirson wrote > > Version 1.07-1 in experimental of e2fsprogs has been superceeded by > 1.10-2 in unstable. I think it should be removed. (experimental > shadows unstable on my system; I think this is normal...)
This shadowing is all to do with the order of directories at the [U]pdate step: if a package occurs more than once with different versions, the later occurrence overrides the earlier one. So if experimental comes last in the list, it will shadow unstable; if it comes first, it will be shadowed. I know that dpkg-mountable allows you to change the order of directories in [A]ccess, but it should be possible to do in most access methods. Having said which, it's far from ideal, the way it is. Some, of course, would argue that you shouldn't be installing automatically from experimental anyway, but I disagree. What would be nicer would be a mechanism to somehow store *all* available versions in the Packages file, along with where they came from, and let the user choose which to install. How about it, guys? Could this go into Deity? Cheers, &E PS To get files moved/deleted on the FTP archive, file a bug against ftp.debian.org. -- Andy Mortimer, [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.netforward.com/poboxes/?andy.mortimer Finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] for PGP public key -- Would you pay life's pleasures to see me? Does it hurt, for I want you to remain? -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
