On Wed, Nov 05, 2003 at 05:23:30PM -0500, Andrew Pimlott wrote: > On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 01:20:49PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > > It does not need to. Feel free to propose a patch to document this > > more clearly (I don't really want to rename it again...) > > Add something like this to the description: > > These headers are not used to compile kernel modules, and need > not match the running kernel or any installed kernel source > tree. > > Andrew
I understand that renaming the package is less than easy and that making the description include this warning is fairly straightforward, but if we acknowledge that there is a problem here, then in the long-run this will come up again and again based soley on the package name, as people won't read the descriptions before complaining. Renaming the package will save trouble later. -- Jon Dowland http://jon.dowland.name/
