On Fri, Jul 25, 2003 at 12:13:44AM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote: > On Jul 24, Robert Lemmen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >me too! any package that doesn't build on m68k or arm is broken and > >needs to be fixed, even if it works on x86 by chance! > > Really? Then please tell me what is broken in libberkeleydb-perl: > > http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=libberkeleydb-perl&ver=0.23-2&arch=arm&stamp=1058302695&file=log&as=raw > > And in the past months some packages (among them mutt, which even fixed a > security bug) were kept out of testing because something was broken in > m68k groff.
Eh, nobody told me (as the groff maintainer) that that was holding up other packages. I couldn't reproduce the problem on crest, only on fabbione's machine, and there it looked like a hardware problem. -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
