On Mon, 16 Jun 2003 12:43:48 +1000, Russell Coker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Mon, 16 Jun 2003 12:11, Theodore Ts'o wrote: >> false positive rate of as high as 2 per day by some estimates, do >> we as a body consider it acceptable if some percentage of Debian >> developers: >> >> 1) Don't receive a mail message from a fellow Debian developer >> because they unfortunately got caught by a false-positive (perhaps >> they got renumbered onto a bad SPAM address, or they were roaming >> on a wireless from a conference or during business travel) and >> important mail that related to Debian business gets lost? > There is no excuse for this. Access to servers that are not in spam > lists is well available to Debian developers. I tunnel my outgoing > mail through a server in Melbourne no matter where I am, this avoids > all issues of spam blocking by IP address. I offered accounts on a > choice of machines to be used for such purposes for any Debian > developers who have no better options, but so far no-one has taken > me up on this offer. I refuse to allow spammers this victory. My machines are fully capable members of the internet, and I deliver my own email. My philosophy is that if people drop mail from me due to incompetence (since setting up machines to classify email from me as spam is indeed a misconfiguration), then I have no real desire to impose my musings on them. manoj -- I always had a repulsive need to be something more than human. David Bowie Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/> 1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E 1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C