On Wed, 14 May 2003 16:27:53 +0200, Matthias Urlichs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Hi, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
>> To the extent that the DDTP gives the package maintainer veto
>> rights, it seems pretty clear that at least initially the DDTP
>> believed that the package maintainer was ultimately responsible.
> It's the maintainer's name and signature on the package, after all.
Quite so.
> On the other hand, the maintainer has to be able to trust their
> translators. They're presumably doing it for the good of Debian and
> not because they want to push their own agendas by subverting
> translations.
I trust my upstreams too. But I always look through the diffs
on updates, and I have local patches to fix upstream bugs all the
time. I may not undestand intricate upstream code, but that does not
prevent me from fixing obvious bugs.
I see the translations as upstream. A different upstream,
perhaps, than the rest of the code, but I retain control of what goes
in my packages.
manoj
--
I don't make the rules, Gil, I only play the game. Cash McCall
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
