Re: /run and read-only /etc

[Anthony DeRobertis]

On Tue, 2003-04-15 at 15:19, Thomas Hood wrote:

> Unfortunately you seem to be wrong, at least with regard to
> bind version 1:8.3.4-4. 

Ah. That'd explain it. I'm using bind9.

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part