On Wed, Apr 09, 2003 at 11:08:56PM +0200, Filip Van Raemdonck wrote: > On Thu, Apr 10, 2003 at 12:32:48AM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote: > > I was surprised that neither of you contacted me as Xpdf maintainer, > > Hmm, well. I've yet to take a closer look at how much gpdf & xpdf source > are alike; I only just decided gpdf was usable enough when I ITPed.
The CVS logs show lots of recent imports of Xpdf 2.02 code, so I'd say it's pretty similar. > Gpdf is just one binary, and some GNOME specific support files. > It doesn't have (it would be stupid to do so) any of the xpdf utilities. > Nor does it need say xpdf-common installed to work, it's standalone. And Does it not support the Xpdf language handling? eg the files in /usr/share/xpdf, /etc/xpdf etc. This seems to be pretty important to many Debian users. > There just isn't anything useful yet IMO at this point to contact you > about. Simple as that. OK, if you think so. Hamish -- Hamish Moffatt VK3SB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
