On Wed, Aug 14, 2002 at 10:00:35AM -0400, Daniel Burrows wrote: > On Wed, Aug 14, 2002 at 08:16:46AM +0200, "J.H.M. Dassen (Ray)" <[EMAIL > PROTECTED]> was heard to say: > > On Tue, Aug 13, 2002 at 22:06:12 -0700, Joseph Carter wrote: > > > On Wed, Aug 14, 2002 at 06:57:24AM +0200, Harald Dunkel wrote: > > > > Please note that the C++ ABI has been changed with gcc 3.2.
> > > Again? *sigh* > > "The main point of the GCC 3.2 release is to have a relatively stable and > > common C++ ABI for GNU/Linux and BSD usage. Unfortunately this means that > > GCC 3.2 is incompatible with GCC 3.0 and GCC 3.1 releases." > > (http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-3.2/c++-abi.html) > Wasn't that the point of the GCC 3.1 release? Well, shame on them for having bugs in their software. GCC just isn't up to Debian standards, I guess. We should count ourselves lucky that we don't have stable releases using each of the GCC 2.9x, 3.0, and 3.1 ABIs. Steve Langasek postmodern programmer
pgpDhI4l3LXkI.pgp
Description: PGP signature
