On Wed, Apr 03, 2002 at 10:38:30PM +0200, Bas Zoetekouw wrote: > Hi Doug! > > You wrote: > > > I suspect there will be enough people on both sides of this > > issue. How about defaulting to non-verbose behavior, and having > > a `-verbose' variant of all the BTS addresses (or even the > > opposite). Then those who prefer to receive an acknowledgement > > can mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] and so on... > > Or how about just adding a simple procmail rule if you don't want the > ACK's?
Because the point of my original message was to not clutter everyone who doesn't want them with ACKs. For instance, users, and third-party bug tracking systems. This was prompted by the GCC GNATS system, which has dozens of PRs created by these ACKs. There's no good reason GNATS should have to know anything about Debbugs. Why send out messages with no informational content if all or most people are just going to discard them? -- Daniel Jacobowitz Carnegie Mellon University MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
