Chris Cheney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Mon, Jan 10, 2005 at 11:55:30PM +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote: >> * Chris Cheney >> >> | Its all encumbered, there is a separate organization MPEG-LA that >> | strictly deals with the licensing. It is quite surprising to me that >> | ffmpeg was allowed into main. >> >> According to rumors I heard, it was allowed in since other >> applications (xine at least, I think) already included it. So it >> didn't really make a difference -- if we're infringing on patents with >> ffmpeg, we are with xine as well. >> >> (Apologies if xine is not the package I'm thinking about.) > > Wouldn't that be an argument to have xine removed from Debian not the > addition of ffmpeg?
ffmpeg is already in Debian : http://packages.debian.org/unstable/graphics/ffmpeg Christian -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]