severity 411426 important thanks On Sat, Mar 31, 2007 at 02:00:36AM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Steve Langasek, le Fri 30 Mar 2007 16:41:13 -0700, a écrit : > > On Sat, Mar 31, 2007 at 12:40:48AM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > > Samuel Thibault, le Tue 27 Mar 2007 20:01:56 +0200, a écrit : > > > > Is there a reason for delaying an upload fixing brltty #411426, #414068 > > > > and #411671 bugs?
> > > Actually, only 411426 really needs to be fixed for Etch. Do you have > > > time for doing the upload, or could it be NMUed? > > Um, I don't see that this is a bug that needs to be fixed for etch, and I'm > > generally not in favor of significantly reorganizing binary packages at the > > last minute before release. Could you please elaborate why you've marked > > this as 'serious'? > libbrlapi1 is meant to ship a library. Currently, it also ships > /sbin/xbrlapi and /lib/brltty/libbrlttybba.so binaries. Later on, if we > need to upload a new libbrlapi2, that one will have to conflict with > libbrlapi1, hence preventing from installing both versions of libraries > and smooth library transitions. Ok, well if that's the only argument, then it's not release-critical. I might still consider accepting such a fix for etch depending on time available and how straightforward the provided solution is, but the reverse-dependencies of libbrlapi1 are not so numerous that a /non/-smooth library transition for lenny would significantly handicap us. Thanks, -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
