Daniel Ruoso wrote: > Qui, 2007-03-01 às 14:21 +0100, Brice Goglin escreveu: > >> Daniel Ruoso wrote: >> >>> Well, the version in experimental also breaks, but it presents a >>> different backtrace... >>> >> Do you onyl have compiz in experimental? Or also some other X packages? >> Which xserver-xorg-core do you have? The following backtrace seems to >> end up in xserver-xorg-core, you could try this package in experimental >> too :) >> > > Only compiz-related packages. But, yes, I can try xserver-xorg-core from > experimental... Any other package? >
Looking at the dependencies, mesa could be upgraded too... >>> Backtrace: >>> 0: X(xf86SigHandler+0x84) [0x80c4354] >>> 1: [0xffffe420] >>> 2: /usr/lib/xorg/modules/extensions/libGLcore.so(_mesa_free+0x1d) >>> [0xa780d21d] >>> 3: /usr/lib/xorg/modules/extensions/libGLcore.so(XMesaDestroyVisual >>> +0x1d) [0xa7910e2d] >>> 4: /usr/lib/xorg/modules/extensions/libGLcore.so [0xa791031f] >>> 5: /usr/lib/xorg/modules/extensions/libglx.so(__glXResetScreens+0x44) >>> [0xb7c76b04] >>> 6: /usr/lib/xorg/modules/extensions/libglx.so [0xb7c75d2c] >>> 7: X(CloseDownExtensions+0x42) [0x8093f12] >>> 8: X(main+0x4a3) [0x806e6b3] >>> 9: /lib/tls/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xc8) [0xb7db3ea8] >>> 10: X(FontFileCompleteXLFD+0xa9) [0x806d9d1] >>> >> How did you get this backtrace? It does not look like a complete >> backtrace with debugging information that gdb could give. >> > > This appears in my X log file. I'm not even sure of who prints it out, > but as the X server breaks, I would think this is printed by the x > server itself. > > I don't know, but maybe this unveils a xorg bug, more than a compiz bug. > Could you ssh from another machine and attach gdb to X before starting compiz ? (with "gdb -p $(pidof X)") If would be great to do this with a server recompiled for debugging. If you want to do so, see how to build at http://wiki.debian.org/HowToGetABacktrace (with hello=xserver-xorg-core). Brice
