Daniel Ruoso wrote: > Well, the version in experimental also breaks, but it presents a > different backtrace... >
Do you onyl have compiz in experimental? Or also some other X packages? Which xserver-xorg-core do you have? The following backtrace seems to end up in xserver-xorg-core, you could try this package in experimental too :) > Backtrace: > 0: X(xf86SigHandler+0x84) [0x80c4354] > 1: [0xffffe420] > 2: /usr/lib/xorg/modules/extensions/libGLcore.so(_mesa_free+0x1d) > [0xa780d21d] > 3: /usr/lib/xorg/modules/extensions/libGLcore.so(XMesaDestroyVisual > +0x1d) [0xa7910e2d] > 4: /usr/lib/xorg/modules/extensions/libGLcore.so [0xa791031f] > 5: /usr/lib/xorg/modules/extensions/libglx.so(__glXResetScreens+0x44) > [0xb7c76b04] > 6: /usr/lib/xorg/modules/extensions/libglx.so [0xb7c75d2c] > 7: X(CloseDownExtensions+0x42) [0x8093f12] > 8: X(main+0x4a3) [0x806e6b3] > 9: /lib/tls/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xc8) [0xb7db3ea8] > 10: X(FontFileCompleteXLFD+0xa9) [0x806d9d1] > How did you get this backtrace? It does not look like a complete backtrace with debugging information that gdb could give. Brice -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
