Am Dienstag, den 23.01.2007, 23:41 +0100 schrieb Kurt Roeckx: > found 1.0.26-1 > thanks > > On Tue, Jan 23, 2007 at 11:14:54PM +0100, Lars Lindner wrote: > > Am Dienstag, den 23.01.2007, 22:39 +0100 schrieb Kurt Roeckx: > > > On Tue, Jan 23, 2007 at 07:39:30PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote: > > > > reopen 361376 > > > > found 361376 1.0.27-1 > > > > found 361376 1.1.7c-1 > > > > thanks > > > > > > > > I'm still experiencing lots of segfaults with liferea-gtkhtml on amd64, > > > > and not on i386. It happens with both the unstable and the experimental > > > > version. > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > You marked it as segfaulting in unstable and experimental. Does it also > > > affect the version in testing (1.0.26-1)? > > > > No chance it is the same over all version. It is just unusable. > > So I'm tagging this as found in 1.0.26-1 too. > > > I added a check in SVN trunk in configure.ac to disable the GtkHTML2 > > rendering module on x86_64 platforms. > > > > I'd suggest to drop the package for all 64bit platforms (if this is > > possible at all). > > If you want to drop support for 64 bit arches, this would be more > than just amd64/x86_64. This would include atleast alpha and ia64 too.
The reports I get upstream are all AMD64 related. I had somewhat good experiences on SPARC but cannot guarantee it to be stable on other 64bit platforms. Also the XHTML rendering in GtkHTML2 is somewhat ugly (spacings that cannot be avoided...) and so I think it is better not to use it. > Anyway, you'll need to stop building the liferea-gtkhtml binary package > on 64 bit arches, and then ask ftp-master to remove the binary packages > on those arches. > > The good news seems to be that only liferea itself is making use of > liferea-gtkhtml, so it shouldn't be that hard to get rid of it. Yes, liferea-gtkhtml missing won't hurt anyone. Lars -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
