On Fri, 2007-01-12 at 20:20 +0100, Loïc Minier wrote: > On Fri, Jan 12, 2007, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: > > I am saying that the build failure, in my opinion, has *nothing to do* > > with missing packages. There is no indication in the error that the > > problem is a missing package; the indication is that the error is a > > mistaken use of guile-1.8. > > But if the build process uses guile-1.8 when it's available instead of > the build-deps, and the build subsequently fails in some conditions, a > build-conflict is missing.
No. You are making all kinds of assumptions, and just guessing, I think. The debian/rules file explicitly uses guile-1.6 unconditionally. If that isn't working for some reason, then the problem must be tracked down, I agree, but it does not follow that a build-conflict is the right solution. In fact, it is certainly the wrong solution. Thomas
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
