On Fri, 2007-01-12 at 10:25 +0100, Loïc Minier wrote: > On Thu, Jan 11, 2007, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: > > I don't see any reason to think there are missing build deps. It seems > > rather like the build is pulling in parts of guile-1.8 for some bogus > > reason. I can't tell, however, without seeing the full build log. > > Whatever it pulls, dpkg-checkbuilddeps should complain that either > build-deps are missing or build-conflicts are not honored, otherwise > it's a serious bug of gnucash to not express its build-conflicts with > other packages in the archive. Since the package fails to build for > the submitter, either build-deps or build-conflicts are not honored and > dpkg-checkbuilddeps will report it, or he should file a serious bug on > gnucash.
I am saying that the build failure, in my opinion, has *nothing to do* with missing packages. There is no indication in the error that the problem is a missing package; the indication is that the error is a mistaken use of guile-1.8. Thomas
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
