On Saturday 28 October 2006 11:09, Julien Danjou took the opportunity to say:
> There was a problem while autobuilding your package:
> > #   Failed test 'result() works and gave expected answer'
> > #   in t/verifier.t at line 28.
> >
> > #   Failed test ''mine_ietf01_1.txt' should 'pass''
> > #   in t/verifier.t at line 80.
> >
> > #   Failed test ''mine_ietf01_2.txt' should 'pass''
> > #   in t/verifier.t at line 80.
> >
> > #   Failed test ''mine_ietf01_3.txt' should 'pass''
> > #   in t/verifier.t at line 80.
> >
> > #   Failed test ''mine_ietf01_4.txt' should 'pass''
> > #   in t/verifier.t at line 80.
> >
> > #   Failed test ''good_ietf00_1.txt' should 'pass''
> > #   in t/verifier.t at line 80.
> >
> > #   Failed test ''good_ietf00_2.txt' should 'pass''
> > #   in t/verifier.t at line 80.
> >
> > #   Failed test ''good_ietf00_3.txt' should 'pass''
> > #   in t/verifier.t at line 80.
> >
> > #   Failed test ''good_ietf00_4.txt' should 'pass''
> > #   in t/verifier.t at line 80.
> >
> > #   Failed test ''good_ietf00_5.txt' should 'pass''
> > #   in t/verifier.t at line 80.
> >
> > #   Failed test ''good_ietf01_1.txt' should 'pass''
> > #   in t/verifier.t at line 80.
> >
> > #   Failed test ''good_ietf01_2.txt' should 'pass''
> > #   in t/verifier.t at line 80.
> >
> > #   Failed test ''bad_ietf01_1.txt' should 'fail''
> > #   in t/verifier.t at line 80.
> >
> > #   Failed test 'determined body had been altered'
> > #   in t/verifier.t at line 47.
> >
> > #   Failed test ''bad_ietf01_2.txt' should 'fail''
> > #   in t/verifier.t at line 80.
> >
> > #   Failed test 'determined header had been altered'
> > #   in t/verifier.t at line 49.
> >
> > #   Failed test ''bad_ietf01_3.txt' should 'fail''
> > #   in t/verifier.t at line 80.
> >
> > #   Failed test 'determined RSA failure'
> > #   in t/verifier.t at line 51.
> > # Looks like you failed 18 tests of 22.

Needless to say I can't reproduce this. Maybe the failure is transient; 
verifier.t depends on DNS and the public DKIM key at 
shan._domainkey.vmt2.cis.att.net being available. Too bad the test script 
doesn't print more details.

-- 
Magnus Holmgren

Attachment: pgprUqSn5txLc.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to