Hi, On Tue, Oct 17, 2006, Frank Küster wrote: > I fail to understand. Or maybe you missed that db2latex-xsl wasn't just > removed recently and temporarily in order to ease some transition. It > has been removed a while ago, and I don't see any chance of its > reinclusion into etch. It seems it is quite dead upstream (as you might > remember, you've researched that yourself, too), and nobody seems to > care for it.
My mistake, I thought this was about db2latex-xsl being missing from etch, but it was truly about cdbs that should rely on something else. > The result would be that cdbs is unbuildable in etch, which the security > and release teams won't like. I don't want to play BTS ping-pong, but I > think this bug should be re-reassigned to cdbs, and it should be patched > to use dblatex instead of db2latex-xsl, or whatever docbook converter > you prefer. (aba reassigned already.) In the meantime, I had a look at db2latex-xsl, and it's in a very bad shape indeed. Bye, -- Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
