On 17/10/06 at 21:31 +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > Frank Küster wrote: > > I fail to understand. Or maybe you missed that db2latex-xsl wasn't > > just removed recently and temporarily in order to ease some > > transition. It has been removed a while ago, and I don't see any > > chance of its reinclusion into etch. It seems it is quite dead > > upstream (as you might remember, you've researched that yourself, > > too), and nobody seems to care for it. > > Well, if db2latex-xsl is dead upstream, then whatever we have as source > in the archive is the source, so the bug claiming that we don't have > the right sources is obsolete. > > Really, we have other problems right now than setting up a new docbook > toolchain because someone doesn't like the translation source files in > the old one.
Hi, Andreas also mentioned on IRC that he pushed db2latex-xsl back to testing, so this bug can be closed. But if you can build without it, it's probably better since db2latex-xsl is not really in a poor shape. Lucas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
