* Sebastiaan Couwenberg <[email protected]> [2026-08-15 19:50]:
On 8/15/26 7:43 PM, Jochen Sprickerhof wrote:src:qgis in unstable can't migrate to testing because the QA infrastructure couldn't reproduce the some binary packages in unstable while it could reproduce the version in testing [1, 2].AFAIK qgis has never been reproducible.
For completeness: Britney evaluates reproducibility per binary package independently. That's why it states:
Migration status for qgis (3.44.13+dfsg-1 to 3.44.13+dfsg-2): BLOCKED: Rejected/violates migration policy/introduces a regression Issues preventing migration: ∙ ∙ Piuparts regression - https://piuparts.debian.org/sid/source/q/qgis.html ∙ ∙ Reproducibility regression on arm64: libqgis-app3.44.13, libqgis-gui3.44.13 ∙ ∙ Reproducibility regression on armhf: libqgis-core3.44.13 ∙ ∙ Reproducibility regression on i386: libqgis-app3.44.13 ∙ ∙ Missing build on riscv64 ∙ ∙ Lintian check waiting for test results on riscv64 - info ∙ ∙ Too young, only 3 of 5 days old ∙ ∙ Depends: qgis glibc Additional info (not blocking): ∙ ∙ Updating qgis will fix bugs in testing: #1143800 ∙ ∙ Not reproduced on amd64 (not a regression): python3-qgis-common I.e. it is reproducible in testing except for python3-qgis-common.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
