Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The consequences of these guidelines for the tex licensing bugs seem to be > as follows: > > 345604: > ConTeXt upstream says they aren't interested in relicensing; RC bug.
This is already solved, ConTeXt documentation is in tetex-doc-nonfree > csname.txt: etch-ignore (due to blanket license statement?). Yes, it's part of AMSTeX which has a general license statement. > unixtex.ftp: etch-ignore. > l2tabuen.pdf, pdftex-a.pdf, fontinstallationguide.pdf, l2kurz.pdf: > ok per the GFDL GR All are already in tetex-doc-nonfree. We can put l2tabuen.pdf, pdftex-a.pdf and l2kurz.pdf back into tetex-doc. However, fontinstallationguide contains fonts that are non-free, or in other words we do not have the complete source for this PDF file. > l2tabu.pdf: ok per James Troup in bug #384019 (?) already in tetex-doc-nonfree, can be moved back > doc/encspecs/ and examples: etch-ignore. So this all is already resolved. However, there are more issues in this bug that should be resolved, in particular files without source: - The TeX Catalogue, source at cvs -d :pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvsroot/texcatalogue export -r HEAD texcatalogue (needs python-xml) - tds.dvi: Sources at http://www.tug.org/ftp/tex/tds/ or http://www.ctan.org/tex-archive/tds/ - faq: http://www.tex.ac.uk/tex-archive/help/uk-tex-faq/ I've written earlier in this bug: ,---- | Since we should really check other docs as well, I'm retitling this one, | and we'll keep it open until every document has been checked. `---- However, since we're not going to finish the complete auditing (which covers TeX input files, not only documentation), I'm closing this in the next changelog entry. Regards, Frank -- Frank Küster Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
