Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Er, first of all, according to your last email we still have the following > two issues: [...] > These were designated "ignorable for etch", but that doesn't mean they > aren't problems, and nothing in your mail suggested that they are resolved.
Yes, sorry, I missed these two. > Second, it's improper to close bugs in changelog entries for versions of a > package that don't actually fix those bugs. The next upload will contain a new orig.tar.gz, where the ones you identified as RC are removed. Plus one more you didn't notice, the GFDL'ed fontinstallationguide.pdf with incomplete source. This and at least the ConTeXt stuff relates to this bug. > Anyway, setting the etch-ignore tag now. Thanks. Shouldn't this be delayed until the fixed package reaches etch? At least I wanted to ask for etch-ignore tags for the remaining licensing bugs as soon as that has happened. Regards, Frank -- Frank Küster Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
