On 25 May 2024 at 12:35, Bo YU wrote: | Hi, | On Sat, May 18, 2024 at 06:41:53AM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | > | >On 17 May 2024 at 23:05, Santiago Vila wrote: | >| Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | >| > Is there a chance this could be spurious? | >| | >| Unlikely because it also happens here: | >| | >| https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/rpy2.html | > | >Ok, I will get in touch with Laurent. | | hmm, the failure will not happen on riscv64 real hardware when I am | trying to get below diff file.
Thanks for working through this, and a good idea to piggy-back on the existing test skipping for mips64! The only thing that is a little troubling the overall skip of the 'datetime from timestamp' test but we probably added that one for a reason too... I think I will apply this. Many thanks! Dirk | -- | Regards, | -- | Bo YU | | x[DELETED ATTACHMENT rpy2_fix_ftbfs_riscv64.debdiff, plain text] | x[DELETED ATTACHMENT signature.asc, application/pgp-signature] -- dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | e...@debian.org
