On Fri, Dec 22, 2023 at 12:04:48AM +0100, Gregor Riepl wrote:
> Hi Carsten,
> [...]
> 
> My point was that if, for whatever reason, werkzeug 3.0.1 is not yet fit for
> release, it should be enough to upgrade to 2.3.5 to address these unit test
> failures.
> [...]
> 
> That doesn't make any sense to me. These deprecations are obviously in
> werkzeug and not flask-login. Why would changes in flask-login fix them?
> 
> Not saying flask-login shouldn't be updated, but that's not the right scope
> for this bug report.

Just to throw in: these werkzeug failures are also causing a similar
FTBFS in debugpy; I've temporarily addressed it by skipping these unit
tests, but that's not a great solution.

I just took a quick look at upgrading the unstable/testing version of
werkzeug to 2.3.8 in the meantime.  It was pretty quick, and the
package tests all pass.  Shall I upload it to unstable?  On salsa, I
would push to debian/2.x for the Debian branch and to upstream-2.x for
the upstream, so as not to prevent merging the experimental branch
into debian/master later.  Actually, it is probably OK to use the
upstream branch for this update without causing problems, but might be
better to be safe.

(Incidentally, while doing this, I spotted one bug with the current
experimental version: it is missing a Build-Depends on
python3-markupsafe.)

Best wishes,

   Julian

Reply via email to