James Troup wrote:
Aurelien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Well this patch has been merged upstream in November 2005,
Bzzt, no, it wasn't.
~/debian/packages/binutils/binutils-2.17 % grep ld.so bfd/elfcode.h
zsh: exit 1 grep ld.so bfd/elfcode.h
That part of the patch was, as I said, rejected upstream.
True, this part has been rejected upstream, but all other parts, ie most
of them, have been accepted. So I can't let you say the "patch as
originally posted was rejected there".
We have found another way to fix (or to workaround?) the problem by
modifying the kernel, and it has been accepted upstream. That's why I
have sent another mail in November 2005, retitling the bug, and
reassigning it to binutils-multiarch, with a *new version* of the patch
only including the only missing part, ie the debian part.
--
.''`. Aurelien Jarno | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
: :' : Debian developer | Electrical Engineer
`. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
`- people.debian.org/~aurel32 | www.aurel32.net
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
