Your message dated Tue, 5 Jan 2021 09:56:50 +0100
with message-id
<CACxpPiQrOerZLL=3iquryhwdrsbsvoebpezcznxawsr8hkp...@mail.gmail.com>
and subject line Re: [Pkg-rust-maintainers] Bug#979243: FTBFS:
rust-cpp-demangle - obsolete dep on rust-if-cfg-0.1-dev
has caused the Debian Bug report #979243,
regarding FTBFS: rust-cpp-demangle - obsolete dep on rust-if-cfg-0.1-dev
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
979243: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=979243
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: rust-cpp-demangle
Version: 0.2.13-1
Severity: Serious
It has this build dependency:
librust-cfg-if-0.1+default-dev (>= 0.1.9-~~) <!nocheck>,
(And a matching, hard-coded Depends line on the binary package)
However, this version of rust-cfg-if is now gone and replaced by 1.0
(Just FYI: the same holds true for many other rust packages, rust-log for
example, IIRC)
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi Peter.
Odd. We are rebuilding packages in debian testing, but for some unknown
reason (I'm still looking into it), the rust-cfg-if-0.1 source package was
not considered. After manually adding it, everything works fine, thanks for
the hint.
Cheers,
Sven
Am Mo., 4. Jan. 2021 um 18:34 Uhr schrieb peter green <plugw...@p10link.net
>:
> > librust-cfg-if-0.1+default-dev (>= 0.1.9-~~) <!nocheck>,
> >
> > (And a matching, hard-coded Depends line on the binary package)
> >
> > However, this version of rust-cfg-if is now gone and replaced by 1.0
>
> A new source package "rust-cfg-if-0.1" has been introduced which builds
> the binary package librust-cfg-if-0.1-dev which provides
> "librust-cfg-if-0.1+default-dev (= 0.1.10-2)". Looking at the log on
> reproducible builds I see it successfully using the new package.
>
> Have you actually seen a build failure anywhere? if so can you point to
> the log?
>
--- End Message ---
