Hi, Сб 09 мая 2020 @ 20:59 Paul Gevers <elb...@debian.org>:
> Source: swi-prolog > Version: 8.1.29+dfsg-2 > Severity: serious > Tags: sid bullseye > X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org > User: debian...@lists.debian.org > Usertags: flaky > > Dear maintainer(s), > > You package has an autopkgtest, great. However, it seems to regularly > fail [1] on both amd64 and arm64. > > Because the unstable-to-testing migration software now blocks on > regressions in testing, flaky tests, i.e. tests that flip between > passing and failing without changes to the list of installed packages, > are causing people unrelated to your package to spend time on these > tests. Please either fix the test to be more robust, or use the "flaky" > restriction for the offending test until a solution has been found. > > I copied the output at the bottom of this report. All the failing tests > that I inspected look like it. > > I'll have the migration software ignore the results of your autopkgtest > until this bug is fixed. > > Paul > > [1] https://ci.debian.net/user/britney/jobs?package=swi-prolog > > https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/amd64/s/swi-prolog/5373683/log.gz > > Running test set "file" > (2329).(2332).(2335).(2338).(2341).(2343).(2346).(2348).(2350).(2353).(2357)[Thread > 1 (main) at Fri May 8 15:26:09 2020] > /build/swi-prolog-Chg12z/swi-prolog-8.1.29+dfsg/src/os/pl-os.c:1093: > deleteCanonicalDir: Assertion failed: 0 > C-stack trace labeled "assert_fail": > [0] PL_strtod() at ??:? [0x7f51fc9d36f1] > [1] __assert_fail() at ??:? [0x7f51fc991e16] > [2] PL_get_file_nameW() at ??:? [0x7f51fc9bd6a0] > [3] PL_get_file_nameW() at ??:? [0x7f51fc9bdba9] > [4] PL_get_file_nameW() at ??:? [0x7f51fc9bde80] > [5] FreeMemory() at ??:? [0x7f51fc9bee4b] > [6] PopTty() at ??:? [0x7f51fc9c0307] > [7] PL_get_file_name() at ??:? [0x7f51fc9bb48f] > [8] PL_next_solution() at ??:? [0x7f51fc907836] > [9] pl_skip_list3_va() at ??:? [0x7f51fc9465cf] > [10] pl_skip_list3_va() at ??:? [0x7f51fc946e3b] > [11] PL_initialise() at ??:? [0x7f51fc989a9c] > [12] /usr/bin/swipl(+0x10a7) [0x55ca1e9350a7] > [13] __libc_start_main() at ??:? [0x7f51fc71be0b] > [14] /usr/bin/swipl(+0x10fa) [0x55ca1e9350fa] > Aborted this should be fixed in 8.1.30+dfsg-1 currently in NEW queue. It was uploaded to experimental due to introduction of some changes to packaging, but upload to unstable will follow shortly after it gets accepted. Cheers! Lev
