Your message dated Fri, 12 Jun 2020 10:35:37 +0500
with message-id <87bllo7snq.fsf@localhost>
and subject line 
has caused the Debian Bug report #960131,
regarding swi-prolog: flaky autopkgtest: test set "file" ... aborted
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
960131: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=960131
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: swi-prolog
Version: 8.1.29+dfsg-2
Severity: serious
Tags: sid bullseye
X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: flaky

Dear maintainer(s),

You package has an autopkgtest, great. However, it seems to regularly
fail [1] on both amd64 and arm64.

Because the unstable-to-testing migration software now blocks on
regressions in testing, flaky tests, i.e. tests that flip between
passing and failing without changes to the list of installed packages,
are causing people unrelated to your package to spend time on these
tests. Please either fix the test to be more robust, or use the "flaky"
restriction for the offending test until a solution has been found.

I copied the output at the bottom of this report. All the failing tests
that I inspected look like it.

I'll have the migration software ignore the results of your autopkgtest
until this bug is fixed.

Paul

[1] https://ci.debian.net/user/britney/jobs?package=swi-prolog

https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/amd64/s/swi-prolog/5373683/log.gz

Running test set "file"
(2329).(2332).(2335).(2338).(2341).(2343).(2346).(2348).(2350).(2353).(2357)[Thread
1 (main) at Fri May  8 15:26:09 2020]
/build/swi-prolog-Chg12z/swi-prolog-8.1.29+dfsg/src/os/pl-os.c:1093:
deleteCanonicalDir: Assertion failed: 0
C-stack trace labeled "assert_fail":
  [0] PL_strtod() at ??:? [0x7f51fc9d36f1]
  [1] __assert_fail() at ??:? [0x7f51fc991e16]
  [2] PL_get_file_nameW() at ??:? [0x7f51fc9bd6a0]
  [3] PL_get_file_nameW() at ??:? [0x7f51fc9bdba9]
  [4] PL_get_file_nameW() at ??:? [0x7f51fc9bde80]
  [5] FreeMemory() at ??:? [0x7f51fc9bee4b]
  [6] PopTty() at ??:? [0x7f51fc9c0307]
  [7] PL_get_file_name() at ??:? [0x7f51fc9bb48f]
  [8] PL_next_solution() at ??:? [0x7f51fc907836]
  [9] pl_skip_list3_va() at ??:? [0x7f51fc9465cf]
  [10] pl_skip_list3_va() at ??:? [0x7f51fc946e3b]
  [11] PL_initialise() at ??:? [0x7f51fc989a9c]
  [12] /usr/bin/swipl(+0x10a7) [0x55ca1e9350a7]
  [13] __libc_start_main() at ??:? [0x7f51fc71be0b]
  [14] /usr/bin/swipl(+0x10fa) [0x55ca1e9350fa]
Aborted


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi,

buggy verison of swi-prolog was substituted with new 8.2.0+dfsg-2 both
in unstable and testing, so I'm closing the bug report.

Cheers!
Lev

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to