>>>>> "Stephen" == Stephen Gran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

    Stephen>  The main problem  was lost  +x perms,  most likely  due to
    Stephen> patch, and  me not noticing that the x  bit was lost before
    Stephen> upload.  I don't know that wholesale reversion of packaging
    Stephen> decisions is a good thing to do in an NMU.

    Stephen> In short, I see  that this NMU appears to introduce several
    Stephen>  rather major  changes  that address  problems  in the  bug
    Stephen> report in  a rather strange way.  Please  don't upload yet.
    Stephen> I  understand the maintainer  (and I, as his  sponsor) have
    Stephen> been remiss in not addressing this RC bug.

The +x perm wasn't the main  issue, fixing this problem, there was a lot
of   remaining   problems   with   this  package   (especially   debconf
problems). We  have heavily tested  this patch (using mysql,  pgsql, and
testing the  installation of the package)  and it works  really fine, in
addition  we have  reviewed this  patch carefully.  So i  don't  see any
problem, really, this patch works very well.

Regards,
Arnaud Fontaine


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to