On Sun, 05 Feb 2017, Brian May wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 07, 2016 at 09:26:04AM +0100, Jakub Novak wrote:
> > With the latest update of Debian packages in Scratch, Amavis started to 
> > reject more than 50% of all emails as spam.
> > From Amavis debuging logs, all the MySQL fields that are of type "float" 
> > does not get its correct values from database anymore, but are all "0". 
> > Varchar, int and tinyints are still OK.
> > With spam_kill_level 0, Amavis behaves that all emails with spam score >= 0 
> > are rejected as sure spam. No quarantine, no spam tagging.
> > I guess it must be something with data type conversion, because SQL SELECT 
> > that Amavis sends to Mysql (observed from Amavis.log and Mysql.log) returns 
> > all values and all field names fine.
> > That is verified from Amavis debug log, where no "lookup_sql_field, no such 
> > fields" are logged (except spam_tag3_level, sa_username, sa_userconf and 
> > forward_method, same as before the bug).
> 
> Is anything happening with this bug?

I don't know.  I never use mysql (or any DB, really) with amavisd-new,
and I have no idea why it would fetch 0  instead of the proper float
value from mysql, or how to fix it :-(

> The last I see is:
> https://lists.amavis.org/pipermail/amavis-users/2017-January/004712.html
> 
> In any case it looks like amavisd-new won't be included in the stretch
> release, it was removed from stretch and I don't think we can get it
> back in now.

If we managed a minimal fix _fast_ and throughoutly tested it, we could
at least *ask*...

> At least it should be easy to backport as required.

Sort of, and it will be annoying as all heck, though.  I should know, I
maintain official backports of most of my packages.  amavisd-new is
security-sensitive (even if it has a very good track record), so the
testing + backports delay is not going to help any.

At least it was confirmed in IRC that we can maintain stretch-backports
from buster *and* buster security-updates, so it *is* workable, if very
sub-optimal.

-- 
  Henrique Holschuh

Reply via email to