On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 01:18:32PM -0600, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
>
> On 28 November 2016 at 21:01, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> | On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 07:13:38AM -0600, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> | >
> | > On 28 November 2016 at 14:13, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> | > | Package: r-cran-rcmdr
> | > | Version: 2.3-1-1
> | > | Severity: serious
> | > |
> | > | r-cran-rgl was removed on armel (see #842088).
> | > |
> | > | r-cran-rcmdr is currently not able to re-enter testing
> | > | since its dependencies cannot be fulfilled on armel.
> | > |
> | > | There are two options for r-cran-rcmdr to re-enter testing:
> |
> | It seems I did express myself in a misleading way.
> |
> | I meant "either 1. OR 2.",
> |
> | > | 1. make the r-cran-rgl dependency !armel if that makes sense
> | >
> | > I can (and will now) do that.
> | >
> | > | 2. - let src:rcmdr build-depend on r-cran-rgl so that it gets built
> | > | only on architectures where the latter is available, plus
> | >
> | > I'll do that too. It is an old package with many Suggests; I usually try
> to
> | > keep Depends and Build-Depends in check.
> |
> | Now you have:
> | Build-Depends: r-cran-rgl
> | Depends: r-cran-rgl [!armel]
> |
> | You are removing r-cran-rgl from the dependencies on armel,
> |
> | while ensuring through the build dependencies that it won't ever get
> | built again on armel.
>
> My bad. I guess there was a reason I didn't have it in Build-Depends.
>
> Will remove.
>...
If r-cran-rcmdr should be in stretch, this has to be uploaded
before Christmas.
> Dirk
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
